The relation between the language of the Quran and science

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant professor, Interdisciplinary Quranic Studies Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

The true interdisciplinary study needs knowledge and mastery in three levels of epistemological, methodological and linguistic requisites. The linguistic level is one of the most important fundamental levels in science, which needs to be considered in interdisciplinary communication. Two major approaches about the language of the Qur’an are considered by researchers till now: philosophichermeneutics and textual. Muslim researchers are interested in the former approach and orientalists frequently incline to the latter. Although the relation between the language of the Qur’an and the language of science with text-oriented approach is less frequently taken into account. Considering the foresaid approach in this article, the author studies the differences between the language of the Qur’an and the language of science and classifies them into five categories: 1. The use of ambiguity and linguistic amphibology; 2. The use of analogy, metaphor and metonymy; 3. Holism and polysemy; 4. The application of the language of sermon and dialogue; 5. The application of verbal complexity. The use of these five linguistic features of the Qur’an is to a large extent different from their use in science. It thus causes complexity in the relation between the Qur’an and humanism on the one hand and experimental sciences on the other.

Keywords

References

Barbour, E. (1983). ‘Ilm wa Dīn (Science and Religion), Trans. Khurramshāhī, B. Tehran: Nashr-i Dānishgāhī.
Biglan, A. (1973a). The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034699
Haghshenas, A. M. (1977). Awāshināsī (Phonetics). Tehran: Āgāh.
Hampel, C. (1958). The Theoretician’s Dilemma. In Feigl, H. et al (Eds). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
al-Ḥillī, Ḥasan ibn Yūsuf (1991). al-Ghawāʻid al-Jaliyyah fī Sharḥ al-Risālah al-Shamsiyyah. Qom: Nashr-i Islāmī.
Izutsu, T. (1989). Khudā wa Insān dar Qur’ān (God and Man in the Qur’an), Trans. Ārām, A. Tehran: Farhang-i Islāmī.
Jones, A. (1994). The Language of the Qur’ān. The Arabist, 6-7, 29-48.
al-Jurjānī, ‘Abd al-Ghādir (1987). Asrār al-Balāghah, Trans. Tajlīl, J. Tehran: Dānishgāh-i Tihrān.
al-Khu’ī, A. (2015). al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Qom: ‘Ilmī.
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1995). Tafsīr-i Nimūnah. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah.
Malikī Miyānjī, M.B. (1998). Nigāhī bih ‘Ulūm-i Qur’ānī (A Glance at Qur’anic Sciences). Qom: Khurram.
Sells, M. (1996). Bewildered Tongue: The Semantics of Mystical Union in Islam. In Idel, M. & Mcginn, B. (Eds). Mystical Union in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, 87-124. New York: Continuum.
Nekounam,, J. (2000). “Spoken or written language of the Qur'an”, Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 1(3), pp. 21-38. https://doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2000.517
Neuwirth, A. (2002). Form and Style of Qur’an. In: McAuliffe, J.D. (Ed). Encylopaedia of the Qur’an, 245-266. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Neuwirth, A. (2004). Rhetoric and the Qur’an. In: McAuliffe, J.D. (Ed). Encylopaedia of the Qur’an, 461-476. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Newton, I. (1729). Principia, Trans. Motte, A. London: Benjamin Motte.
Nöldeke, T. (2004). Ta’rīkh al-Qur’ān (Geschichte des Qorāns), Trans. Tamer, G. et al. Beirut: Almaz.
Pakatchi, A. (2009). Linguistic Requisites of Interdisciplinary Studies. The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1, 111-135.
Rohani Mashhadi, F., Maaref, M. (2016). ‘Defining the Nature of “Seven Heavens” Based on the Theory of “Khalq” and “Amr” in the Qur’an’, Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, 13(2), pp. 151-184. https://doi.org/10.22051/tqh.2016.2355
Saidi Roshan, M.B. (2002). Zabān-i Qur’ān yā Zabān-i Wīzhah-yi Hidāyat (Language of the Qur’an or the Special Language of Guidance). Qur'anic Doctrines, Razavi University of Islamic Sciences, 4, 21-40.
Quṭb, Sayyid (1991). Fī Ẓilāl al-Qur’ān. Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq.
Shams al-‘Ulamā’ Gurgānī (1910), Muḥammad Ḥusayn. Abdaʻ al-Badā’iʻ. Tehran: Jam.
al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn (2000). al-Itqān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī.
Tabataba'i, M.H. (1996). al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Qom: Jāmiʻah-yi Mudarrisīn.
al-Ṭabrisī, Faḍl ibn Ḥasan (1993). Majmaʻ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Tehran: Nāṣir Khusraw.
al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan (2002). al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics